Finding Paragraph #3

The animal abuse cannot be justified by just saying you hit animals. Animal abuse is not about hitting it is about the scars you leave on the animal-- the pain you leave-- the fear you leave is way worst then the animal's outwards appearance. For example, dog fighting the owner would make his dog fight another dog. If the owner's dog win he gets money, but if the dog lose the owner would abandon the dog, torture it, burn it, or just plain put the dog to sleep. The fact that someone could do things like that to another living being is down right inhumane. Another form of animal abuse is also animal testing. "More than 5 billion tax dollars are invested in animal experiments every year." Some of the cons against animal testing is killing animals for the sake of testing products being completely unethical. Another example of the cons would be it is very expensive to carry experiments on animals, therefore it should not be considered. The main reason there should be no animal testing is because it is also assumed that, most of these testing animals die due to human errors occur either in the concentration of the drug or the amount. This again is considered as wastage of life. This helps my topic because it gives more example of different animal cruelty as well as it tells some of the cons for animal testing.